**PUBLICATIONS**

**Self-referential Propositions**

#### [abstract]

Are there ‘self-referential’ propositions? That is, propositions that say of themselves that they have a certain property, such as that of being false. There can seem reason to doubt that there are. At the same time, there are a number of reasons why it matters. For suppose that there are indeed no such propositions. One might then hope that while paradoxes such as the Liar show that many plausible principles about sentences must be given up, no such fate will befall principles about propositions. But the existence of self-referential propositions would dash such hopes. Further, the existence of such propositions would also seem to challenge the widespread claim that Liar sentences fail to express propositions. The aim of this paper is thus to settle the question—at least given an assumption. In particular, I argue that if propositions are structured, then self-referential propositions exist.

**Proving Unprovability**

To appear in the *Review of Symbolic Logic.*

#### [abstract]

This paper addresses the question: given some theory T that we accept, is there some natural, generally applicable way of extending T to a theory S that can prove a range of things about what it itself (i.e. S) can prove, including a range of things about what it cannot prove, such as claims to the effect that it cannot prove certain particular sentences (e.g. 0 = 1), or the claim that it is consistent? Typical characterizations of Gödel’s second incompleteness theorem, and its significance, would lead us to believe that the answer is ‘no’. But the present paper explores a positive answer. The general approach is to follow lead of recent (and not so recent) approaches to truth and the Liar paradox.

**HIERARCHICAL PROPOSITIONS **

To appear in the *Journal of Philosophical Logic.*

**TRUTH, HIERARCHY AND INCOHERENCE**

To appear in B. Armour-Garb (ed.), *The Relevance of the Liar* (Oxford University Press).

**REPLY TO VANN MCGEE’S ‘WHITTLE’S ASSAULT ON CANTOR’S PARADISE’**

*Oxford Studies in Metaphysics: Volume 9* (Oxford University Press, 2015): 33–41.

**ON INFINITE SIZE**

*Oxford Studies in Metaphysics: Volume 9*** **(Oxford University Press, 2015): 3–19.

**BELIEF, INFORMATION AND REASONING**

*Philosophical Perspectives* 26 (2012): 431–46.

**THERE ARE BRUTE NECESSITIES**

*Philosophical Quarterly *60 (2010): 149–59.

**EPISTEMICALLY POSSIBLE WORLDS AND PROPOSITIONS**

*Noûs *43 (2009): 265–85.

**DIALETHEISM, LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE AND HIERARCHY**

*Analysis *64 (2004): 318–26.